Overview of contemporary theologians who reject Rome’s assessment that ‘the issue has been decided infallibly’

The post-scholastic theologians either ignored the question of women priests (as an issue they considered settled for good) or indulged in rabid misogyny. See the synopsis on how post-scholastic theologians judged women.

where publishedName/authorposition
Bulletin ET 8 (1997) 2, pp. 208-222The Catholic Theological Society of America 
The Tablet
2 Dec 1995
Nicholas LashProfessor of divinity, Cambridge University, UK
America
9 Dec1995
Theol.Studies Sept1997
Francis A. Sullivan SJ
argument with Archbishop Bertone
Emeritus professor Gregorian University Rome
Commonweal 26 Jan 1996Elizabeth A. Johnson, C.S.J.Professor of theology at Fordham University, New York
Pastoralblatt
v. 48 (1996)
Gisbert GreshakeProfessor of theology at the University of Freiburg, Germany
US Catholic April 1996Ann O’Hara GraffProfessor of theology at Seattle University, Washington
In ‘Frauen Ordination’ 1996Peter HünermannProfessor of theology at Tübingen University, Germany
Commonweal 9 Feb 1996Sidney Cornelia CallahanPastoral theologian and author, USA
US Catholic April 1996David KnightPastoral theologian and author, Memphis, USA
 Link to other statements on the Internet 
   

John Wijngaards


Please, credit this document
as published by www.womenpriests.org!