All male children had to be circumcised on the eighth day after birth. This was an essential condition for belonging to the Covenant, more or less parallel to our baptism for belonging to the Church. However, there was no equivalent rite of initiation for women. All this was tantamount to meaning that God had concluded his covenant with the men, the ‘sons of Israel’.
Men dominated in society and religion
- A man could divorce his wives as he liked and had absolute authority over his children.
- It was the man who as sole owner of the family property could distribute it to his sons.
- A woman could not act as a full person within religion. She could not offer sacrifices. She could not make her own religious vows.
- The priestly ministry was restricted to men. Women had access only to part of the temple. Ritual uncleanliness was attached to menstruation and childbirth.
- Only men were circumcised. Women belonged to the Covenant indirectly, through their fathers and husbands.
Further reading:
- the general social fact of male domination
- a genetic origin?
- the Old Testament reality
- the ‘myth’ of male dominance in Jesus’ time
- the creation stories
- Sirach
Jesus brought about revolutionary change. For both men and women are initiated into the new covenant by one and the same rite, namely baptism. In baptism we die with Jesus and rise with Jesus. Both men and women share equally in the eucharistic meal and have equal religious duties.
Jesus himself did not decide the question of women’s ordination. But he established a new priesthood that includes a radical openness to women.
- Christ abolished the Old Testament priesthood based on the sacrality (=presumed holiness) of times, places, cultic objects, priestly descent.
He radically abrogated the distinction itself between the sacred and the profane. This may seem startling to some christians who unconsciously continue to think along Old Testament lines. - Christ instituted a priesthood in whose basic dignity all the baptised share.
- Jesus Christ was open to women,
- but had to cope with male dominance in hisd time,
- Jesus Christ chose twelve apostles,
- was truly human,
- grew in wisdom,
- did not know everything as a human being,
- left decisions to the later Church,
- established a radically new priesthood.

Paul endorsed the fundamental equality in Christ of women and men.
Women took part in the Church’s apostolate.
Paul asked women to wear a veil in the assembly to forestall cultural clashes.
- the principle of equality
- women’s ministries
- women deacons
- Mary seen as role model
- the wearing of the veil
In a reaction against Gnostics, some local Church leaders forbid women to speak in the assemblies.
General Introduction to Women Deacons
3. Church Councils on Women Deacons
The Sacramental Ordination of Women Deacons
the Apostolic Constitutions
;
the Nicolai manuscript
;
the George Varus manuscript
Vatican manuscript no 1872
;
reconstructed from seven manuscripts
;
Syriac manuscript
.
Opponents answered- ‘Women were Deacons’ The Tablet 8 May 1999
- Letters to the Editor of The Tablet
Note: For a ‘tradition’ to be valid , it needs to be scriptural, informed and dynamic. At times, the true Tradition is ‘latent’.
The practice of not ordaining women in the Church was neither scriptural nor informed because of a threefold prejudiceamong Church leaders who considered women :
- inferior by nature and by law;
- in a state of punishment for sin;
- ritually unclean.
The Fathers of the Church rarely spoke about the ordination of women. Those who did were influenced by their own prejudices about women.
- St. Ignatius, Antioch in Syria, died 110 AD
- St. Irenaeus, Marseilles in Gaul ,140 – 203 AD
- St. Clement, Alexandria in Egypt, 150 – 215 AD
- Tertullian, Carthage, North Africa, 155 – 245 AD
- Firmilian, Caesarea in Palestine, 200- 250? AD
- Ambrosiaster, Italy?, 315 – 403 AD
- Epiphanes, Cyprus
- St. John Chrystostom, Constantinople, Asia Minor, 344 – 407 AD
- St. Jerome, Palestine, 347 – 419 AD
- St. Augustine, Hippo, North Africa, 354 – 430 AD
- Pseudo-Augustine ? ?
- St. Isidore, Seville, Spain, 560 – 636 AD
The same applies to early ‘Church Orders’
- Didascalia Apostolorum, socalled ‘Church Order’, 3rd cent.
- Canons of Dionysius, Archbishop of Alexandria, 248 AD
- Council of Nicea, General Church Council, 324 AD
- Local Council of Gangra, local synod, 325-381 AD
- Synod of Laodicea, local synod, 363 AD
- Canons of St. Basil, rules of local bishop, 329-379 AD
- Apostolic Constitutions see here Book VIII, ‘Church Order’, ca. 400 AD
- Council of Carthage, local synod, 345 – 419 AD
- Synod of Orange, local synod, 441 AD
- Council of Chacedon, General Church Council, 451 AD
- Statuta Ecclesiae Antiqua, ‘Church Order’, 485 AD
- Synod of Epaon, local synod, 517 AD
- Synod of Auxerre, local synod, 588 AD
- Synod of Rouen, local synod ,650 AD
- Canons of Bishop Timothy, rules by Archbishop of Alexandria, 680 AD
- Penitentiary of Theodore, rules by Archbishop of Canterbury, 690 AD
- Council of Trullo, General Church Council, 692 AD
- Council of Nicaea II, General Church Council, 787 AD
- Capitulary of Theodulf, rules by Bishop of Orléans, 821 AD
Church Law has incorporated the social and religious prejudices against women, from its earliest codification until now.
- Decretum Gratiani, earliest Church law book, 1140 AD
- Paucapalea, canon lawyer/theologian, 1148 AD
- Rolandus Bandinelli, canon lawyer/theologian, 1148 AD
- Rufinus, canon lawyer/theologian, 1159 AD
- Sicardus of Cremona, canon lawyer/theologian, 1181 AD
- Hugucchio, canon lawyer/theologian, 1188 AD
- Johannes Teutonicus, canon lawyer/theologian, 1215 AD
- Henricus de Sergusio, canon lawyer/theologian, 1253 AD
- Guido de Baysio, canon lawyer/theologian, 1300 AD
- Joannes Andreae, canon lawyer/theologian, 1338 AD
- Antonius de Butrio, canon lawyer/theologian, 1408 AD
The medieval theologians excluded women from the priesthood on obviously invalid social and philosophical grounds.
- Paucapalea, canon lawyer/theologian, 1148
- Rolandus Bandinelli, canon lawyer/theologian, 1148
- Rufinus, canon lawyer/theologian, 1159
- Sicardus of Cremona, canon lawyer/theologian, 1181
- Hugucchio, canon lawyer/theologian, 1188
- Johannes Teutonicus, canon lawyer/theologian, 1215
- St. Thomas Aquinas,
on woman’s lower status
on how women are born
on women’s ordination, theologian, 1225 – 1274 - St. Bonaventure, theologian, 1217-1274
- Henricus de Sergusio, canon lawyer/theologian, 1253
- Guido de Baysio, canon lawyer/theologian, 1300
- Joannes Andreae, canon lawyer/theologian, 1338
- Antonius de Butrio, canon lawyer/theologian, 1408

- H.Kramer and J.Sprenger, ‘The Hammer of Witches’, 1486
- John Knox, Calvinist theologian, 1558
- Cornelius a Lapide, Scripture scholar, 1616.
- Codex Iuris Canonici, from a standard commentary canons regarding women, 1234 – 1916 AD
- New Code of Church Law, canons regarding women, 1917 – 1983 AD
- Latest Code of Church Law, canons regarding women, 1983 AD.

Please, credit this document
as published by www.womenpriests.org!
