Abuse of authority in the Catholic Church
BISHOPS
- Only yes-men selected. Gate controlled by the secret ‘Oath of Fidelity’
- Bishops are denied their rightful responsibility within their own dioceses. They represent Christ directly, they do not represent the Pope.
- Bishops’ Conferences not given the national autonomy envisaged by the Vatican Council.
- Bishops do not dare to speak out in defence of their people. Bishops who express dissent are sacked.
- The Synods of Bishops, created by Vatican II to curb the power of the Curia, have been incapacitated.
The appointment of 'party-line' bishops |
Originally a bishop was appointed over a diocese by the local church. The role played by the Pope in Rome has grown over the centuries. At times, the influence of Rome has been beneficial to a local church. But in recent years the Pope has abused his role by systematically selecting only candidates who are anti-reform. |
|
Books about this in print
|
The suppression of the rights of Bishops' Conferences, the Synod of Bishops and individual bishops |
As a check against excessive centralisation of all power in Rome, the Second Vatican Council laid down the rights and duties of Bishops' Conferences for ruling the Church in each country It also established the Synod of Bishops with the express purpose of provinding a counter-balance against the Vatican Congregations. |
Australian Bishop William Morris, who publicly questioned the Church's rejection of married priests and women priests, tells the story of his dismissal. Online documentation
|
Books about this in print
|
For a new vision, see: Authority in the Catholic Church |

Online documentation